Science Has Found Proof of the Existence of God!

Posted By on May 22, 2019



so here's the question as science discovered God well Einstein didn't believe it was possible but Stephen Hawking said it might be the greatest scientific discovery of all time so what discovery has baffled the greatest scientific minds the past century and why is it caused them to rethink the origin of our universe well new and more powerful telescopes have unlocked mysteries about our universe never before revealed giving us amazing new scientific insight into the origin of life as science discovered God the wait a minute hasn't science proven we don't need God to explain the universe what is it about this discovery that is so fundamentally different and why has it stunned the scientific world well this discovery along with what molecular biologists have learned about the sophisticated coding within DNA have many scientists now admitting that the universe and life itself appear to be part of a grand design one cosmologists put it this way many scientists when they admit their views inclined toward the design argument surprisingly many scientists who are now talking about god have no religious belief whatsoever so what are these stunning discoveries that have scientists suddenly speaking of God well there are three revolutionary discoveries from the fields of astronomy and molecular biology that really stand out one the universe had a beginning – the universe is just right for life three DNA coding reveals intelligence the statements leading scientists have made about these discoveries may shock you let's take a look the universe had a one-time beginning since the dawn of civilization man is gazed in awe at the Stars wondering what they are and how they got there although on a clear night the unaided human eye can see only about 6000 stars Hubble and other powerful telescopes reveal there are a billion trillion stars clustered in over 100 billion galaxies in fact our Sun is like one grain of sand amidst the world's beaches but prior to the 20th century the majority of scientists believed our own Milky Way galaxy was the entire universe and that only about 100 million stars existed Oh scientists the past believe that our universe never had a beginning they believed that mass space and energy that compose our entire universe had always existed but in the early 20th century astronomer Edwin Hubble discovered that the universe is expanding rewinding the process mathematically he calculated that everything in the universe including matter energy space and even time itself actually had a beginning well shock waves hit the scientific community many scientists including Einstein reacted negatively in what Einstein later called the biggest blunder of my life he fudged the equations to avoid the implication that the universe had a beginning well perhaps the most vocal adverse area the idea that the universe had a beginning was the British astronomer Sir Frederick Hoyle who sarcastically nicknamed the creation event a big bang he stubbornly held to his steady state theory that the universe had always existed well so did Einstein and other scientists until the evidence for a beginning became overwhelming the logical conclusion was like the proverbial elephant in the room namely that something or someone beyond scientific investigation must have started it all then finally 1992 the COBE satellite experiments proved that the universe really did have a one-time beginning in an incredible flash of light and energy although some scientists called it the moment of creation most preferred referring to it as the Big Bang astronomer Robert Jastrow tries to help us imagine how it all began the picture suggests the explosion of a cosmic hydrogen bomb the instant in which the cosmic bomb exploded marked the birth of the universe so the conclusion is everything in the universe came from nothing science is unable to tell us what or who caused the universe to begin but some believe it clearly points to a creator Oh British theorists Edward Milne wrote a mathematical treatise on relativity which concluded by saying as to the first cause of the universe in the context of expansion that is left to the reader to insert but our picture is incomplete without him another British scientist Edmund Whittaker attributed the beginning of our universe to Divine Will constituting nature from nothingness many scientists were struck by the parallel of a one-time creation event from nothing with the biblical creation account in Genesis 1:1 prior to this discovery many scientists regard the biblical account of creation from nothing is unscientific although he called himself an agnostic Robert Jastrow was compelled by the evidence to admit now we see how the astronomical evidence leads to a biblical view of the origin of the world another similar statement came from agnostic George Smoot the Nobel prize-winning scientist in charge of the COBE experiment he put it like this there is no doubt that a parallel exists between the Big Bang as an event and the Christian notion of creation from nothing scientists who used to scoff at the Bible's account of creation are now admitting that the biblical concept of creation from nothing has been right all along cosmologists who specialized in the study of the universe in its origins soon realized that a chance cosmic explosion could never bring about life any more than a nuclear bomb would unless it was precisely engineered to do so and that meant a designer must have planned it they began using words like super intellect creator and even Supreme Being to describe this designer why is this because the universe is finely tuned for life physicists calculated that for life to exist gravity and the other laws of physics that govern our universe needed to be intricately tuned just right or our universe couldn't exist for instance did you know that if the expansion rate of the universe had been slightly weaker gravity would have hold all matter back into a big crunch we're not talking about merely a one or two percent reduction in the universe's expansion rate Stephen Hawking writes if the rate of expansion one second after the Big Bang had been smaller by even one part in a hundred thousand million million the universe would have rika elapsed before it ever reached its present size well on the flipside if the expansion rate had been a mere fraction greater than it was all galaxies stars and planets could never have formed and we wouldn't be here and for life to exist the conditions in our solar system and our own planet also need to be just right for example we all realize that without an atmosphere of oxygen none of us would be able to breathe and without oxygen water couldn't exist without water there would be no rainfall for our crops other elements such as hydrogen nitrogen sodium carbon calcium and phosphorus are also essential for life but that alone is not all it's needed for life to exist the size temperature relative proximity and chemical makeup of our planet Sun and Moon also need to be just right and there are dozens of other conditions that needed to be exquisitely fine-tuned or we wouldn't be here to think about it the scientists who believe in God may have expected such fine-tuning but atheists and agnostics were unable to explain the remarkable quote/unquote coincidences the theoretical physicist Stephen Hawking and agnostic writes the remarkable fact is that the values of these numbers seem to have been very finely adjusted to make possible the development of life it all brings us to one question the universe accident or miracle but couldn't this fine-tuning be attributed to chance after all oddsmakers know that even long shots can eventually win at the racetrack and against heavy odds lotteries are eventually won by someone so what are the odds against a human life existing by chance from a random explosion in cosmic history well for human life to be possible from a Big Bang utterly defies the laws of probability one astronomer calculates the odds at less than one chance in a trillion trillion trillion trillion trillion trillion trillion trillion trillion trillion trillion trillion in other words it would be far easier for a blindfolded person in one try to discover one specially marked grain of sand out of all the beaches of the world look at it this way the odds of one random Big Bang producing life as we know it would be like one person winning over a thousand consecutive mega million-dollar lotteries after purchasing only a single ticket for each not very likely really quite impossible unless it was fixed by someone behind the scenes which is what everyone would think and that is what many scientists are concluding someone behind the scenes designed and created the universe well this new understanding of how miraculous human life is in our universe led the agnostic astronomer George Greenstein to ask is it possible that suddenly without intending to we've stumbled upon the scientific proof of the existence of a Supreme Being however as an agnostic Greenstein maintains his faith in science rather than a creator to ultimately explain our origins Robert Jastrow explains why some scientists are reluctant to accept a transcendent creator he says there is a kind of religion in science it is the religion of a person who believes there is order and harmony in the universe this religious faith the scientists is violated by the discovery that the world had a beginning under conditions in which the known laws of physics are not valid and as a product of forces or circumstances we cannot discover when that happens the scientist has lost control if you really examine the implications he would be traumatized well it's understandable why scientists like Greenstein and Hawking seek other explanations rather than attribute our finely tuned universe to a creator Hawking speculates that other unseen and unprovable universes may exist increasing the odds that one of them like ours is perfectly fine tuned for life however since his proposal is speculative and outside of verification it can hardly be called scientific although he's also an agnostic british astro physicist Paul Davies dismisses Hawking's idea as too speculative he writes such a belief must rest on faith rather than observation although Hawking continues leading the charge to explore purely scientific explanations for our origins other scientists including many agnostics have acknowledged what appears to be overwhelming evidence for a creator astronomer Frederick oil wrote a common sense interpretation of the facts suggests that a super intellect has monkeyed with physics as well as chemistry and biology and that there are no blind forces worth speaking about in nature although Einstein wasn't religious and didn't believe in a personal God he called the genius behind the universe and intelligence of such superiority that compared with it all the systematic thinking and acting of human beings is an utterly insignificant reflection atheist Christopher Hitchens who spent much of his life writing and debating against the existence of God was most perplexed by the fact that life couldn't exist if things were different by just one degree or one hair Davies acknowledges there is for me powerful evidence that there is something going on behind it all it seems as though somebody has fine-tuned nature's numbers to make the universe the impression of design is overwhelming but astronomy is not the only area where science has discovered evidence for design there is another discovery DNA the language of life as recent as 1953 molecular biologists discovered intricately complex design in the microscopic world of DNA this tiny molecule has been called the brains behind each cell in our body as well as every other living thing yet the more they discover about DNA the more amazed they are at the brilliance behind it scientists who believe the material world is all that exists like Richard Dawkins argued DNA evolved by natural selection without a creator yet even most ardent evolutionists admit that the origin of DNA's intricate complexity is unexplainable the DNA's intricate complexity caused its co-discoverer Francis Crick to believe that it could never have originated on earth naturally Creek and evolutionist believe life is too complex to have originated on earth and must have come from outer space he wrote an honest man armed with all the knowledge available to us now could only state that in some sense the origin of life appears at the moment to almost be a miracle so many are the conditions which would have had to have been satisfied to get it going the coding behind DNA reveals such intelligence that it staggers the imagination a mere pinhead volume of DNA contains information equivalent to a stack of paperback books that would encircle the earth five thousand times and DNA operates like a language with its own extremely complex software code Microsoft founder Bill Gates says that the software of DNA is far far more complex than any software we have ever developed Richard Dawkins and other evolutionary biologists believe that all this complexity originated through natural selection yet as Crick a Nobel Prize winner remarked natural selection could never have produced the first molecule many scientists believe that the coding within the DNA molecule points to an intelligence far exceeding what could have occurred by natural causes in the early 21st century noted atheist Anthony flues lifelong unbelief came to an abrupt end when he studied the remarkable intelligence behind DNA flu explains what changed his position what I think the DNA material has done is to show that intelligence must have been involved in getting these extraordinarily diverse elements together the enormous complexity by which the results were achieved looked to me like the work of intelligence it now seems to me that the finding of more than 50 years of DNA research have provided materials for a new and enormous ly powerful argument to design although flu is not a Christian he admitted that the software behind DNA is far too complex to have originated without a designer all this scientific evidence leads us to honestly consider that life and the universe have the fingerprints of a Creator our scientists now convinced that a creator has left his fingerprints on the universe although many scientists are still bent on squeezing God out of the universe most recognized the religious implications of these new discoveries in his book the grand design Stephen Hawking who doesn't believe in a personal God attempts to explain why the universe doesn't need God yet when faced with the evidence even Hawking has also admitted there must be religious overtones but I think most scientists prefer to shy away from the religious side of it as an agnostic world renowned astronomer Robert Jastrow had no Christian agenda behind his conclusions however he freely acknowledges the compelling case for a creator he writes of the shock and despair experienced by scientists who thought they had squeezed God out of their world these are his words for the scientist who has lived by his faith in the power of reason the story ends like a bad dream he has scaled the mountains of ignorance he's about to conquer the highest peak and as he pulls himself over the final rock he is greeted by a band of theologians who have been sitting there for centuries so what if after all there is a creator if there is a super intelligent creator the question arises what is he like is he just some cosmic force like in Star Wars or is he a personal being like us well since we're personal and relational beings wouldn't the one who created us also be personal and relational many scientists like Arthur al-shabab professor of physics at Stanford University and winner of the Nobel Prize in Physics believed that these new discoveries provide compelling evidence for a personal God he writes it seems to me that when confronted with the marbles of life in the universe one must ask why and not just how they're the only possible answers are religious I find a need for God in the universe and in my own life if God is personal and since he has given us the ability to communicate wouldn't we expect him to communicate with us and let us know why we are here as we've seen science is unable to answer questions about God and the purpose for life however since the Bible was right about creation from nothing might it also be trustworthy regarding God life and purpose the 2,000 years ago a man set foot on our planet who claimed to have the answer to life although his time on earth was brief his impact changed the world and is still felt today his name is Jesus Christ the eyewitnesses to Jesus Christ tell us that he continually demonstrated creative power over nature's laws they tell us he was wise humble and compassionate he He healed the lame deaf and blind he stopped raging storms instantly it created food you nation began for it was through him that everything was made with her spiritual or material scene or you then it was necessary for him to rise from the dead so that we too could have life after death as the Creator Jesus certainly would have power over life and death and those closest to him claimed they saw him alive after he died and was buried for three days if they were wrong then Christianity has been founded upon a lie but if they were right such a miracle would substantiate all Jesus said about God himself and us but must we take the resurrection of Jesus Christ by faith alone or is there solid historical evidence several skeptics began investigations into the historical record to prove the resurrection account false what did they discover let me invite you to click on the link below to take a closer look at the evidence for the most fantastic claim ever made the resurrection of Jesus Christ from the dead

Posted by Lewis Heart

This article has 20 comments

  1. This video is based on false premises, misinterpreted theories and faulty science. You have 3 premises. 1. The universe has a beginning. Not necessarily true. The fact the universe could be infinite can not be ruled out. 2. The universe is just right for life. That should be changed to the universe suits life as we know it. 3. Dna code means a creator. Dna is not code it’s chemical reactions. The idea that it’s some sort of code is just false. We humans interpret it as code because that makes it easier to understand. So the 3 premises the video is built on is false along with other bits and pieces.

    Reply
  2. this is not true Allah is the real god he created us he created jesus! he made the phenomenons in this world this video does not have full proof

    Reply
  3. I believe the world in 2 parts

    The earth was formed and the universe was made by the Big Bang and that

    But when it was nothing….God helped the Earth with life

    Now God has left us… he feels annoyed with himself that he made Apes to form into Humans..now he left us…to Destroy this beautiful planet

    Reply
  4. You can watch my way to God on this video: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=DSxKS9oDfjE

    Reply
  5. The biggest question that I really want to know is, and some people will want to know is, has science discovered life after death?

    Reply
  6. The Lord is the only God who doesn’t create within Space and Time. Every other God in every other book was created and “creates” within space and time. So you know, no other god or book of whatever god these people think they believe in mentions creation of Space and time besides The Lord. People can believe in six armed demons all they want lmao 😂

    Reply
  7. Who are you confessing to ? a made up jesus? Do you know how religions came about? What if you put put your all into a book that had lies and secrets. Why has the bible been rewritten so much. Who gave your jesus a face? Do you ever research the very religions that you have faith in? or do you blindly allow anyone to tell you anything and believe it. I did and then i woke up and studied world religions. If most of you didn't get religion from childhood would you know what it was? religion relies on people having faith and only believing in the word knowing that it contradicts its self. Would you lie to your children if you found out the truth of your reality?

    Reply
  8. I did not believe in God until I took DMT. After which, I realised that our mind is so powerful. Our experiences, all our senses depend on the mind. Without a mind, there will be nothing, just nothingness. And it’s this nothingness which is the answer. This nothingness which is the most powerful thing in our universe. It is so powerful that time and space has no effect on it. This most powerful thing in the universe which can’t be anything due to it’s immense power, for such power is impossible to acquire any physical form, or what I call ‘something’. Therefore, this power is not possible to be ‘something’, only nothing would make this power possible.

    Reply
  9. All is mind and the universe is mental. Space is not empty. It contains unmanifested potential. Quantum physics calls this the superposition. Once the wave probability wave collapses due to conscious demand it manifests as matter or thoughts, speech and actions. There is no creator no destroyer. The universe has a fracttal pattern. It goes on infinitely on cycles of existence. Your body holds the blueprints of the universe. As above so below. As whithin so without.

    Mind is timeles and recognizing minds true nature is enlightenment. This means becoming the quantum field from which springs all existence and to which everything dissolves into. This is what buddha means. To realize mind brings timeless bliss and awarenes.

    Split down matter enough and you will arrive at emptiness

    Take a box in vacum and darkness and photons and matter will start to appear. These facts are proven

    Inside cyclic existence you can strive for self liberation which is the path of courage, fearlesness, joy, compassion, wisdom, generosity, protection and help or you can choose the path of self destruction filled with confusion, ignorance, fear, hate, intense suffering, anger, jealosy, greed etc.

    You are free to choose what you like but you are not free from the consequences of your choices.

    This is the universal law of cause and effect that operates in all possible planes of existence

    That is why buddha gave teachings and methods on how to realise minds timeless nature

    Reply

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *