PHILOSOPHY – Soren Kierkegaard

Posted By on November 29, 2019


Søren Kierkegaard was a brilliant, gloomy, anxiety-ridden, often hilarious Danish 19th century philosopher. The author of 22 books, of which 3 continue to make his name. He was born in an immensely wealthy family in Copenhagen in 1813, the youngest of 7 children. Death was around him constantly from a young age, and was to obsess him throughout his career. It is, in a sense, his only theme. Not only was he extremely physically frail, by the time he was 22, all his siblings had died except for he and a brother. It drove him to furious production of books over 15 years. On a single day in 1843 he published no less than 3 works. He wasn’t writing for the money; he was working to save himself, and, he thought, humanity. As it happened, he made it to the age of 42, then died of an excruciating spinal disease. In “Either/Or” and “Fear and Trembling”, what Kierkegaard wants to do above all is wake up and give up our cozy sentimental illusions. He systematically attacks the pillars of modern life: our faith in family, our trust in work, our attachment to love, and our general sense that life has purpose and meaning. His enemies were the smug in all their guises, particularly, the prosperous Danish haute bourgeoisie, and the members of the established Danish church. He tells us, “As I grew up I opened my eyes and saw the real world, and I began to laugh and I haven’t stopped since. I saw that the meaning of life was to get a livelihood, that the goal of life was to be a High Court judge, that the brightest joy of love was to marry a well-off girl, that wisdom was what the majority said it was, that passion was to give a speech, that courage was to risk being fined ten dollars, that cordiality was to say “you’re welcome” after a meal, and that the fear of God was to go to communion once a year. That’s what I saw and I laughed.” Kierkegaard was especially caustic about the 19th century understanding of love, and the new ideology of passionate marriage, which aimed to unite desire with prudence, and suggested that one could enjoy all the thrills of a love affair, and, at the same time, all the stability for long-term relationship. But, Kierkegaard mocked the notion that one could ever fuse romantic laugh with marriage, that one could have passion and sex, and, at the same time, children, stability, and routine. He respected both, he just couldn’t believe you could have them both at the same time- in a cozy marriage sanctified by the state and the neighborhoods. His belief arose out of his own tortured love life. He fell in love with a beautiful, precocious, and talented 18-year-old girl, called Regine Olsen, only then to break off the engagement as he realized that to try and live with her forever would also mean killing the love that had drawn him to her. Everywhere he turned, Kierkegaard saw intolerable incompatibilities, and impossible choices. It led him to one memorable explosion in “Either/Or”: “Marry and you will regret it. Don’t marry; you will also regret it.” “Marry or don’t marry; you will regret it either way.” “Laugh at the world’s foolishness; you will regret it.” “Weep over it; you’ll regret that too.” “Hang yourself; you’ll regret it. Don’t hang yourself and you’ll regret that too.” “Whether you hang yourself or don’t hang yourself, you will regret both.” “This, gentlemen, is the essence of all philosophy.” The mention of laughter is not a coincidence; key to Kierkegaard’s philosophy is that: the only intelligent tactical response to life’s horror is to laugh defiantly at it. Rarely has a philosopher taken humor as seriously. Kierkegaard is often described as the founder of the philosophical movement known as “existentialism”, because, in him, we find all the themes that would so interest later thinkers, like Sartre, Camus, and Heidegger. The book that fascinated the existentialists was Kierkegaard’s, “The Concept of Anxiety”, published in 1844, in which he emphasized a new word, “angest”, or “angst”, as we know it in English, a condition where we understand how many choices we face, and how little understanding we can ever have of how to exercise these choices wisely. As Kierkegaard wrote, “Life can only be understood backwards, but must be lived forwards”. Our constant angst means that unhappiness is more or less written into the script of life, as he wrote, “anyone who has given the matter any serious thought will know that I’m right when I say,” “it’s not possible for anyone to be absolutely, and in every conceivable way, completely content,” “not even for a single half hour of his life.” “No one has come into the world without crying. No one asks when you want to enter the world; no one asks when you want to leave.” “How empty and meaningless life is; we bury a person, throw three shovels of earth over him,” “drive out in a coach, drive back in a coach, and console ourselves that we still have life enough left to live.” “But really, how long is three score and ten; why not just get it over with straight away?” For Kierkegaard there was, however, one answer that he put forward ever more stridently in his later works: Jesus Christ. Kierkegaard loathed the Christianity of the established Danish church, but he adored the simple truths of the Gospels that his father taught him as a boy For him, Christianity was a religion of extreme surrender to a theology of almost peasantlike simplicity: one was to be ready to die for Christ, to give up all attachment to worldly things, and to love all humans like one’s siblings. Kierkegaard wasn’t interested in justifying his attachment to Christianity through rational means; instead, he recommended a dramatic and now famous ‘leap of faith’, wherein one wouldn’t apply one’s puny mind to attempting to prove the existence of God, one would merely switch off one’s faulty rational faculties, and jump into the idea of God as the total solution. As he put it, “To have faith is to lose your mind and to win God”. Like Marxist communism, Kierkegaard’s solutions to the problems of being human are far less convincing and interesting than the diagnoses of our ills; few of us now make that leap, but Kierkegaard deserves our attention for the beautifully bitter, caustic look he casts on the human condition. He’s one of the few philosophers one can turn to when the world has badly let us down, and we’re in need of a friend who can fully understand the dark places we’re in once the sentimental illusions, that normally keep us going, fall away.

Posted by Lewis Heart

This article has 100 comments

  1. I wonder if he had any access to the Nag Hammadi or the general themes therein as he is pretty well-describing humanities predicament with its archon rulers.

    Reply
  2. I liked it up until you started mocking him for holding Christian views. You have to be prepared to embrace his philosophy in its entirety regardless of your own personal views.

    Reply
  3. My response to some comments is, when you learned there was no Father Christmas after all, did you want to commit suicide? No. You just wanted to be alive. Well, the same goes for “there is no life, of itself”.
    (read Part B of the following);

    https://www.linkedin.com/pulse/life-after-death-keith-perreur-lloyd-2c/

    Reply
  4. So he had it pretty spot on until it came to Jesus. Unfortunate that he championed a purposeful suspension of rational thought.

    Reply
  5. Maybe Kierkegaard had his Dark Night of The Soul??? Which is really a blessing disguise as it gives an individual an opportunity to work off all their Karma in one lifetime? A brave man was Soren indeed to experience a lifetime of misery and betrayal and loneliness, he must have rejected the many temptations of Life?. But he must have held on to the end and was rewarded by God's Grace. As he chose Death as his Teacher in his Life, he must have seen and experienced the most heinous of situations and visions, one would never wish to ever see again ever. Which makes one think that the Fear of God should put us off committing grievous sins towards other created beings. The maxim of Harm None in thought, word and action comes to mind!!!

    Reply
  6. Strange that you never said anything about his understanding of the subjective and the objective world; moreover his three phases of being.

    Reply
  7. "Let the disappointments pass, let the laughter fill your glass, let your illusions last, until they shatter. Whatever you might hope to find, among the thoughts that crowd your mind, there won't be many, that ever really matter." – Jackson Browne

    Reply
  8. I see most modern philosophers are rather nihilistic. That is "trendy" to say that life is meaningless.
    Heidegger is one that is not nihilistic.

    Reply
  9. Not of what you saying is meaningless you can have the regrets of anything to everything but wants the point of existing with all of these regrets

    Reply
  10. How an existenlist believes in an “idiot” character like jesus? Where he presented the ideology that despises the existence and focus on the afterlife and salvation.

    Reply
  11. White man philosophy is so much more depressing than eastern philosophy, which is full of calmness and contentment rather than sadness

    Reply
  12. I think it was J B Priestly who noted a permeating tone of adolescence in both Kierkegaard and Nietzsche – the Vitruvian ideal seems to me the antidote to both after taking real appreciations: build well, stay practical but ally it with fine operations of intellect. In the modern period I cannot think of anyone who better exemplifies this than Christopher Wren – Architect Philosopher Mathematician and interesting Occultist.

    Reply
  13. My friend has read his books and couldn’t understand him. This is an excellent explanation. Basically, life is complicated but we all think it is simple, black and white, it isn’t and Kerkegaard understands this more than anybody. The forerunner of existentialism.

    Reply
  14. I love the view on comedy. But yikes on God. If you have to jettison your mind to win god, that should be a clue as to the existence of that god.

    Reply
  15. He was a bit full of shit. I have never gotten married and I DO NOT REGRET IT ONE SINGLE BIT! In fact, I rejoice at that every morning when I wake up!

    Reply
  16. no one is coming to the world without crying, no one asks when you want to enter the world, and no one asks when you want to leave!!!!!!!!!!!!!

    Reply
  17. For mig, er Kierkegaards syn på religion fuldstændigt ligegyldigt. Ironien i øvrigt værende, at den institutionalisering af kristendommen som han hadede så meget på sin måde er blevet genopbygget gennem hans filosofi i Danmark og I andre lutherske lande. Hans filosofis anvendelighed består, efter min mening, mestendels i hans undersøgelser af døden og allervigtist; angsten. Uden denne ville vi på mange måde stå på bar bund i den psykoterapeutiske behandling af angstlidelser.

    English:
    To me, Kierkegaards views on religion are essentially redundant. The irony consequently also being that the institutionalization of christianity that he despised so, in a way has been rebuilt around his philosophy in Denmark and many other Lutheran countries/communities. The practicality of his philosophy exists IMO entirely in his examinations into death and most importantly ANXIETY. Without these defining examinations we would be without tools in the diagnosing and psychotheraputic treatment of anxiety-disorders and other mental illness'.

    Reply
  18. Ancients Indian school called guru Kul knows as temple of knowledge and they use to teach them all the divine lesson most important lessons 1) god is sitting inside everyone and respect everyone irrespective of caste race country because your god is inside him, 2) do not find fault on others if you find fault then who finds your own mind then it becomes dirty and you take that person sins so never find fault on others. The book called philosophy of divine love the ancient teaching for modern world by jagatguru kripalujee Maharaj the original teacher of this universe! Philosophy of divine love all religion and all scriptures essence is there

    Reply
  19. It's amazing how Pewdiepie can read alot of books including Soren Kierkegaard's books, and still commit to being a youtuber. amazing

    Reply
  20. Ufak aklınla tanrıya akıl erdirme veya iman sıçraması belirsizliğe vurgu yapmaktır. Belirsizliğin şuan deneyimlenen sonsuz şimdinin yani zamanın bir formüle edilmesidir. Yaşıyoruz ve endişeli bir varlığız. Bunu nötürlemek için anı belirsizliğe yormalı ve evrensellik baabında düşünerek rahatlamalıyız.

    Reply

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *